 Posted: Sun Jan 29, 2023 9:14 am Post subject: |
|||||
That would be perfect :) thanks for the edit too |
|||||
| Posted: Sun Jan 29, 2023 6:41 am Post subject: |
|||
I fixed that for you. My view (in agreement with you) is that this type of group should, most usefully, be implemented as: The first auction determines whether all the rest are bid on or not. So, if the first is lost all the rest are cancelled (as now) but if the first is won all the rest are scheduled as if they were no longer part of a group at all. |
|||
| Posted: Sat Jan 28, 2023 6:25 pm Post subject: |
|
| Another scenario for âsingle contingencyâ:
Item 1: wins Item 2: wins Item 3: wins Item 4: loses Item 5: bid should still go ahead, since the âsingle contingencyâ (the first bid) won |
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 28, 2023 5:37 pm Post subject: |
|
| Yeahhhhhhh⦠when you insert a link it tells you that h t t p s is blocked for being spam. Changing it to h t t p doesnât help. Now thereâs a nice broken link in my post :P | |
| Posted: Sat Jan 28, 2023 5:35 pm Post subject: Don’t cancel the 3rd contingency bid if the 2nd bid loses |
|
| Hey,
Cupid said in this support thread that if you have the following contingency bids setup: Item 1: wins Item 2: loses Item 3: scheduled Then the bid for item 3 will be cancelled. Is there any way you could implement a new group for âÃÂÃÂsingle contingency bidâÃÂàplease? This would mean that the bid for item 3 would still go ahead if item 1 wins but item 2 loses. Thanks a lot! Danny |
|